‘Slick JD versus cornball Tim’
A panel of marketing campaign strategists and election analysts who watched Tuesday evening’s cordial vice presidential debate between Ohio Sen. JD Vance and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz give their tackle the CBS Information discussion board:
Hank Sheinkopf, Democratic marketing campaign advisor:
“These are the 2 most boring males on the earth. It was slick JD versus cornball Tim.
“Vance did a greater job as a result of he hit the locations the place Democrats have been weakest — inflation, prices and the migrant disaster.
“Walz was the candidate of compassion. Vance was extra polished.
“Walz acquired tongue-tied when he talked in regards to the Center East, however received the alternate on abortion.
“The Democrat’s greatest second was when he hit Trump and Vance onerous over the January 6 riots
“Vance couldn’t clarify baby care and was off-base on well being care.”
Doug Muzzio, Baruch Faculty public affairs professor emeritus:
“Vance was a smoother speaker, extra programmed. Walz was a extra genuine speaker.
“Vance is a clean articulate liar. Didn’t reply any questions; diverted dialog to favourite tropes.
“Walz was awkward, uncomfortable at first. He was shaky, nervous and uncertain of himself. However he had the higher of the substantive arguments.
“He answered the questions requested. He was heat, human, plain-spoken. He related with the viewers and got here off as a succesful, trustworthy, likable individual.
“Vance needed to defend the Jan. 6 riots and didn’t reply the query of whether or not Biden received the 2020 election. It was a profile in cowardice.”
Rob Ryan, Republican Get together strategist:
“Vance was cool, calm, and well-spoken. Walz had speedy eye and head actions that have been distracting to the viewer and harking back to a groundhog on meth.
“Lots of Walz’s responses have been disjointed rambles across the block that by no means actually addressed the query. Particularly cringe-inducing was Walz’s non-response on the place he was when the Tiananmen Sq. bloodbath befell.
“Vance displayed a superb data of coverage and knew the way to clearly and concisely reply the questions. He by no means stumbled or made any main gaffe.
“Vance additionally displayed a laid-back, assured angle with out being nasty or brash, which is able to soften the opinion of many citizens by proving he’s truly likeable.
“Walz will get an ‘A’ for effort by becoming Dick Cheney and Taylor Swift endorsements in a single sentence throughout his closing assertion.
“Vance was the clear winner, however Waltz survived, which is all he needed to do. For essentially the most half the talk was an enormous yawn to all however devoted supporters of the candidates.”
Chris Coffey, political advisor, former aide to Mike Bloomberg:
“Vance moved to the center all evening however couldn’t get away with refusing to say Biden received the 2020 election.
“The Jan. 6 Capitol riot section and the abortion dialogue have been the 2 greatest moments for Walz.
“The worst second for Walz was when he began out anxious and was confronted with fibbing about his whereabouts in the course of the Tiananmen Sq. bloodbath.
“However at the least he leveled with folks that he misspoke versus the revisionist historical past of Vance blaming Congress for saying Trump’s financial insurance policies have been a failure in 2020.
“The most effective moments for Vance have been when he appeared to seek out widespread floor with Walz and appeared considerably regular consequently.
“The worst second for Vance was moving into it with the moderators over fact-checking. Anybody beneath 40 heard that and shuddered
“All in all, Vance was slick tonight. I do surprise if Trump will really feel overshadowed and agree to a different debate.
O’Brien ‘OB’ Murray, marketing campaign strategist:
“A hillbilly with an Ivy League diploma and an previous white man stroll right into a bar, and nobody seen. That was 90 uninspiring minutes of speedy talking and flat dialog.
“Tonight’s debate confirms that this presidential election, like all others, is in regards to the high of the ticket.
“Gov. Walz mentioned points greater than Vice President Harris has since President Biden dropped out of the race.
“All through the talk, Sen. Vance had a extra commanding presence, however he may have been extra private and accomplished a greater job connecting with voters. Nonetheless, Vance exceeded expectations and made himself part of the way forward for the Republican Get together, win or lose.
“Gov. Walz underperformed. He confirmed why he was chosen as VP Harris’ operating mate; no flash or charisma. Simply echoed her speaking factors and assaults on Trump.
“It was attention-grabbing that Vance began off admitting the voters didn’t know who he was, so he took time earlier than answering the primary query on Israel to share his bio.
“However Vance didn’t step up and actually defend President Trump from Gov. Walz’s assaults, which he did an excellent job reiterating.
“Then again, Walz ought to have been higher ready to reply why he lied or misspoke about being in or round China throughout Tiananmen Sq..”